The calculations are made as follows:
Individual runners race times from the prologue are normalised for the race distance using a Riegel Formula
The race used as a base for the next handicap time is then selected in the following order:
The previous handicap race (including prologue)
The current handicap series (including prologue)
The predicted race time for this race is then extrapolated to the distance for the handicap race using the same Riegel Formula as above.
Organisers reserve the right to use a recent best 5-10k time if believed first race time provided is not representative.
If you think there is an issue with the race used or you think you should be listed, then please contact email@example.com ASAP.
Results for individual events in the series will be published on the web site. However, the final result may, at the discretion of the Committee, not be publicised until the Annual Awards night.
Runners set off in groups of similar ability based on their predicted time and their race time is recorded.
Race time is compared to predicted time in terms of a % of predicted time
Runners are placed in order of % improvement (smallest first) - this means that a slower runner will have to improve on their predicted time by much more than someone with a faster time for the same score.
Runners without a verified predicted time will score last place +1 - this is to prevent situations where a first time runner can adversely affect the scores should a very inaccurate predicted time be used for them. Once they have run, then they will have a time that can be used for subsequent races.
Runners scores for their best 4 races are added together with the smallest overall score to giving a male and female winner according to the following criteria:
A runner must have completed a minimum of 4 races
A runner must have raced each of the 3 distances
To help the event run smoothly, the organisers ask the following: